Service Providers

Name	Identifier
ActiveDirectory_PS	ACTIVEDIRECTORY_PS
AXFRDDNS	AXFRDDNS
Azure DNS	AZURE_DNS
BIND	BIND
Cloudflare	CLOUDFLAREAPI
ClouDNS	CLOUDNS
CSC Global	CSCGLOBAL
deSEC	DESEC
DigitalOcean	DIGITALOCEAN
DNSimple	DNSIMPLE
DNS-over-HTTPS	DNSOVERHTTPS
Gandi_v5	GANDI_V5
Google Cloud DNS	GCLOUD
Hurricane Electric DNS	HEDNS
Hetzner DNS Console	HETZNER
HEXONET	HEXONET
Internet.bs	INTERNETBS
INWX	INWX
Linode	LINODE
Name.com	NAMEDOTCOM
Namecheap Provider	NAMECHEAP
Netcup	NETCUP
NS1	NS1
Ovh	OVH
PowerDNS	POWERDNS
Route 53	ROUTE53
SoftLayer DNS	SOFTLAYER
Vultr	VULTR

Provider Features

The table below shows various features supported, or not supported by DNSControl providers. Underlined items have tooltips for more detailed explanation. This table is automatically generated from metadata supplied by the provider when they register themselves inside dnscontrol.

An empty space may indicate the feature is not supported by a provider, or it may simply mean the feature has not been investigated and implemented yet. If a feature you need is missing from a provider that supports it, we'd love your contribution to ensure it works correctly and add it to this matrix.

If a feature is definitively not supported for whatever reason, we would also like a PR to clarify why it is not supported, and fill in this entire matrix.

	ACTIVEDIRECTORY_PS	AXFRDDNS	AZURE_DNS	BIND	CLOUDFLAREAPI	CLOUDNS	CSCGLOBAL	DESEC	DIGITALOCEAN	DNSIMPLE	DNSOVERHTTPS	EXOSCALE	GANDI_V5	GCLOUD	HEDNS	HETZNER	HEXONET	INTERNETBS	INWX	LINODE	NAMECHEAP	NAMEDOTCOM	NETCUP	NS1	OCTODNS	OPENSRS	OVH	POWERDNS	ROUTE53	SOFTLAYER	VULTR
Official Support
DNS Provider
Registrar
ALIAS
AUTODNSSEC
CAA
PTR
NAPTR
SRV
SSHFP
TLSA
TXTMulti
R53_ALIAS
AZURE_ALIAS
DS
dual host
create-domains
no_purge
get-zones

Providers with “official support”

Official support means:

• New releases will block if any of these providers do not pass integration tests.
• The DNSControl maintainers prioritize fixing bugs in these providers (though we gladly accept PRs).
• New features will work on these providers (unless the provider does not support it).
• StackOverflow maintains test accounts with those providers for running integration tests.

Current owners are:

• ACTIVEDIRECTORY_PS @tlimoncelli
• AZURE_DNS @vatsalyagoel
• BIND @tlimoncelli
• CLOUDFLAREAPI @tlimoncelli
• GCLOUD @tlimoncelli
• NAMEDOTCOM @tlimoncelli
• ROUTE53 @tlimoncelli

Providers with “contributor support”

The other providers are supported by community members, usually the original contributor.

Due to the large number of DNS providers in the world, the DNSControl team can not support and test all providers. Test frameworks are provided to help community members support their code independently.

• Maintainers are expected to support their provider and/or find a new maintainer.
• Bugs will be referred to the original contributor or their designate.
• Maintainers should set up test accounts and regularly verify that all tests pass (pkg/js/parse_tests and integrationTest).
• Contributors are encouraged to add new tests and refine old ones. (Test-driven development is encouraged.)

Maintainers of contributed providers:

• AXFRDDNS @hnrgrgr
• CLOUDNS @pragmaton
• CSCGLOBAL @Air-New-Zealand
• DESEC @D3luxee
• DIGITALOCEAN @Deraen
• DNSOVERHTTPS @mikenz
• DNSIMPLE @aeden
• EXOSCALE @pierre-emmanuelJ
• GANDI_V5 @TomOnTime
• HEDNS @rblenkinsopp
• HETZNER @das7pad
• HEXONET @papakai
• INTERNETBS @pragmaton
• INWX @svenpeter42
• LINODE @koesie10
• NAMECHEAP @captncraig
• NETCUP @kordianbruck
• NS1 @captncraig
• OCTODNS @TomOnTime
• OPENSRS @pierre-emmanuelJ
• OVH @masterzen
• POWERDNS @jpbede
• SOFTLAYER@jamielennox
• VULTR @pgaskin

Requested providers

We have received requests for the following providers. If you would like to contribute code to support this provider, please re-open the issue. We’d be glad to help in any way.

In progress providers

These requests have an open issue, which indicates somebody is actively working on it. Feel free to follow the issue, or pitch in if you think you can help.

Providers with open PRs

These providers have an open PR with (potentially) working code. They may be ready to merge, or may have blockers. See issue and PR for details.